Yes, I should have been more clear. I recognize that the point was about common decency, and I think it is a very good point to make. I think I was just venting on a personal pet peeve, and that is when people knowingly put themselves in a position of need for their own convenience and require others to be inconvenienced as a result. And I do know that it is not always an intentional thing, and I am not a perfect planner by any means either. Things happen, and so common decency ought to be in place to help out in times of need. BUT, in this case it doesn't seem like it was a "things happen" situation. It seemed like a case in which better planning could have happened, and was flippantly ignored. That's what bothers me. But if I misinterpreted, I apologize.